By now you’ve most likely heard about the controversy surrounding TSA’s new enhanced security procedures.
In case you’re not familiar, we’ll fill you in. The TSA has begun utilizing full-body scanners as a new means of security screening at airport security checkpoints. If a passenger declines the scan, or sets off any alarms, they are then subjected to a full-body pat down.
Where does the controversy come from? According to The Economist, the full-body scans include outlines of both the breasts and genitalia. The pat downs include a search of these previously off-limit areas as well.
Touted by the TSA as a preferred way to reveal concealed threats without the removal of clothing, many are concerned that these new procedures represent a violation of passenger’s privacy.
Though the TSA has made statements denying the existence of any “groping” incidents, many are still uncertain. One man, whose incident with the TSA has now become viral legend, is potentially facing a $10,000 fine for failing to comply with the TSA’s new procedures.
The controversy has become so heated that a campaign has developed encouraging Americans to “opt-out” of the full body scan on Wednesday the 24th – the day before Thanksgiving – potentially the busiest travel day of the entire year.
Johnathan Capehart of The Washington Post has argued that
“he’d exchange an uncomfortable examination of [his] naughty bits for being blown to bits anytime.”
Many others are not so certain. Representative John J. Duncan Jr., Congressman from Tennessee, former Chairman of the House Aviation Subcommittee has argued that the
“American people should not have to choose between having full-body radiation or a very embarrassing, intrusive pat-down every time they fly, as if they were criminals.”
You can hear the full text of the speech here.
What are your thoughts on the issue? Are convenience and privacy more important safety and security? Are these new procedures justified or is the TSA overstepping its boundaries?
